MontanaPatent Lawyer.

HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
July 20, 2010
Patent
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Patent Law News

 

Court Case to Determine Rights of Online Journalists


Arguments Set for April 20 in San Jose

San Jose - On April 20, EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl will argue Apple v. Does – a case with broad implications for journalists and their right to protect the confidentiality of their sources – before a San Jose, California, appeals court.

Apple Computer, Inc., has sued several unnamed individuals, called "Does," for allegedly leaking information to online reporters about an upcoming product code-named "Asteroid." As part of the suit, Apple has subpoenaed Nfox, the ISP for PowerPage publisher Jason O'Grady, demanding that the ISP turn over the communications and unpublished materials O'Grady obtained while he was gathering information for his articles. Apple has also been granted permission to issue subpoenas directly to Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) clients PowerPage and AppleInsider for similar information.

The trial court held that if a journalist publishes information a business claims to be a trade secret, this act destroys constitutional protection for the journalist's confidential sources and unpublished materials. EFF and co-counsel Thomas Moore III and Richard Wiebe have appealed, asking the appeals court to correct the error and restore the well-settled constitutional protections for a journalist's confidential information.

"The California courts have a long history of supporting and protecting freedom of the press," said EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl. "We are looking forward to the opportunity to ask the Court of Appeal to correct a ruling that endangers all journalists."

WHAT:
Apple v. Does (O'Grady v. Superior Court)

WHEN:
April 20, 9:30am

WHERE:
333 W. Santa Clara St. Suite 1060
San Jose, CA 95113

For more on the Apple v. Does case:
http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Apple_v_Does

Contacts:

Kurt Opsahl
Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation
kurt@eff.org

Rebecca Jeschke
Media Coordinator
Electronic Frontier Foundation
press@eff.org

 


Contact our Montana Patent Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Your invention may already be patented.
Public users may perform preliminary searches of patent information in a variety of formats including on-line, microfilm, and print at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Public Search Facility located in Alexandria, VA. State of the art computer workstations provide automated searching of patents issued from 1790 to the current week of issue. Full document text may be searched on U.S. patents issued since 1971 and OCR text from 1920 to 1970. U.S. patent images from 1790 to the present may be retrieved for viewing or printing. Some foreign patent documents are available.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Patent cases in Montana and nationwide:

Prominent WARF Patent Expert Wins Prestigious National Award
Prominent WARF Patent Expert Wins Prestigious National Award

Patent lawyer Howard Bremer, a pioneer in university-based te...

Read more >


Court Case to Determine Rights of Online Journalists
Arguments Set for April 20 in San Jose

San Jose - On April 20, EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl will argue Apple v. Does – a case with b...

Read more >


Consolidated Patent Rules
Business to be transacted in writing:All business with the Patent and Trademark Office should be transacted in writing. The p...
Read more >


More Patent News >

 
 

Patent Law Terms

 


Tuesday's Term

Comprising

Definition:
A transitional phrase that is synonymous with means the same thing as inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.

DiD

Definition:
Defense in depth - multiple layers of security to provide added protection to IT resources.

Mere Descriptiveness

Definition:
Statutory basis (Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e)(1), TMEP 1209 et seq) for refusing registration of trademarks and service marks because the proposed mark merely describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature,

More Patent Terms >

 

Patent Law Resources

 


Search Patent resources in our resource center:

More Patent Law Resources >

 

Patent Lawyer Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Patents Law:

  • Trademarks & Patents
  • Patent Pending
  • Patent Regulations
  • Invention Patent
  • Patent Infringement Law

More Patent Topics >

Montana Patent Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an patent attorney you should contact our Patent Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Belgrade
  • Billings
  • Bozeman
  • Butte
  • Columbia Falls
  • Great Falls
  • Hamilton
  • Havre
  • Helena
  • Kalispell
  • Laurel
  • Libby
  • Livingston
  • Miles City
  • Missoula
  • Polson
  • Whitefish
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Montana Patent Lawyer.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.